SITUATION STATEMENT:
Composting on site could be an advantage for municipalities
that collect yard waste. If a large percent of homeowners in a municipality composted
their own yard waste, less time and money would be needed for pickup and composting.
Some municipalities have concluded that it is cheaper to cost share a compost
bin with homeowners than it is to pick up yard waste. At present, many municipalities
in Brown County collect yard waste. It would be important for them to know which
bins would be the best choices should they decide to promote a bin program.
OBJECTIVES:
To test 10 (or more) commercially manufactured compost
bins and compare: (1) rate of composting; (2) ease of handling; (3) cost; (4)
size.This is the third part of a three-year study. Please
refer to last year's study for a summary of what occurred in 1995.
PROCEDURE & RESULTS:
On June 12, 1996, Master Gardeners and I spent several
hours mixing 2/3 "brown" material (mostly six-month-old leaves) with 1/3 "green"
material (mostly grass clippings from June 1996) in a concrete bunker that had
at one time been used for salt storage. This activity took place behind the Agriculture
& Extension Service Center, 1150 Bellevue St., Green Bay, Wisconsin.
After that, on the same day, 11 commercial compost bins
and one homemade bin were set up and filled with the mixed material. The amount of material put into each bin
"filled" each bin. Actually, the material was measured by pail into each bin until
the smaller ones were filled. The larger ones were added to until we used all
the mixed material. Temperatures were taken in the center (hottest) of each bin.
Temperatures were recorded for all bins for 15 days.
Compost bins were maintained weekly by Master Gardener
Harvey Plansky and others. Bins that needed tumbling were tumbled and water was
added where needed.
EVALUATION:
Temperature data was used to determine high thermophilic bacterial activity. According to
composting experts in Wisconsin, "A pile needs to be in the 130 to 160 degrees F. range
for optimum decomposition1." The data shows a wide variation from bin to bin. The bins that
sustained higher temperatures longer were judged to be superior in the rate and extent of
decomposition of the compost material during the time frame studied. However, Richard Albert,
bacteriologist, says, "Higher temperatures do not always indicate faster composting." Composting
by bacteria, fungi, etc. does continue at lower temperatures. All the bins had a good amount
of composted material. Compost maturity may not occur until much later than the study's time
frame. We did not test for compost maturity.
Bins 3, 5, 7 and 11 had a mean temperature of 113.0 F. Bins 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 12 had
a mean temperature of 95.9 F. This is a statistically significant difference with a 95%
confidence level (see Tables One and Two). If you equate the mean temperatures with advanced
decomposition, then bins 3, 5, 7 and 11 initially decomposed more quickly than the rest. This
also correlates with nutrients available (see Plot #1) factor analysis comparing nutrient
availability with temperature.
FASTEST DECOMPOSITION:
Bin #3 = 40 cu. ft. (not covered)
Bin #5 = 18 cu. ft. (not covered)
Bin #7 = 22 cu. ft. (not covered)
Bin #11 = 14.5 cu. ft. (not covered)
SLOWEST DECOMPOSITION:
Bin #1 = 18 cu. ft. (covered)
Bin #2 = 12 cu. ft. (covered)
Bin #4 = 6 cu. ft. (covered)
Bin #6 = 10.5 cu. ft. (covered)
Bin #8 = 14.8 cu. ft. (covered)
Bin #9 = 12.5 cu. ft. (covered)
Bin #10 = 9 cu. ft. (covered)
Bin #12 = 23 cu. ft. (covered)
Bins 3, 5, 7 and 11 were uncovered bins, therefore receiving more natural water and thus
keeping the compost going longer (we watered the covered bins but only as they dried out).
The largest bins not covered did the best (as decomposition relates to sustaining temperatures).
If we had uncovered all the bins we would have had a fair comparison. We didn't do that
because we wanted to test the bins as set up by the manufacturers.
It is our hypothesis that most people will not work too hard at composting. Therefore, the
open bin (natural watering) with the biggest volume (that doesn't dry out) will do the best.
That includes bins 3, 5, 7 and 11.
We liked bin #3 the best because of the expandable volume
going up to 40 cu. ft. Can we say statistically that some bins worked better than others? Yes,
we can, but only for the reasons mentioned above. For the average composter and most municipalities
I would recommend an open-topped, large-volume bin. Bin costs (of the open tops) were also
significantly lower. Bins that were the most trouble to use were bin #4 (small volume, dried
out quickly) and bin #12 (too heavy to roll).
All the bins were easy to assemble. The open-top bins were less work (extra watering not needed).
Then you have less control. (If in a humid climate you may have too much rain on them!)
Activators and turning were not used in 1996 because they did not change decomposition
significantly the first year.
IMPLICATIONS:
Homeowners can easily compost yard waste in their own yard. The bins tested looked good, did
not occupy much space and were not subject to rodent infestation. Cost and ease of handling
would be major factors in choosing a bin. We did not test all bins available on the market,
but it is likely that many other bins would perform as well as the ones tested. Homemade bins
should also compare favorably with commercial bins, if they were large enough.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
Thanks to all the distributors and manufacturers of the bins we tested. Backyard composting is a
viable option to help homeowners recycle on site. Thanks to Master Gardeners Harvey Plansky,
Lloyd Giese, and others for much of the physical work. Thanks to Richard Albert, bacteriologist,
and John Peters, soil scientist, for reviewing this document.
1.Maureen Mecozzi, Waste Reduction and Recovery Program, DNR Bureau of Solid and Hazardous
Waste Management, 1969.
|
Bin #
|
Name of Composter
Name of Manufacturer
|
Available at
|
Approx.
Cost1
|
Size
|
Ease2
Easiest=1
Hardest=10
|
Rating3
Superior=1
OK=2
Needs Imprvmnt=3
|
|
1
|
#3735 Rubbermaid Composter
Rubbermaid, Inc., 1147 Akron Rd.,
Wooster, OH 44691
|
ACE & True Value Hardware
|
$89.00
|
18 cu. ft.
|
1
|
2
|
|
2
|
Four Panel Deluxe Composter
North States Industries, Inc.
1200 Mendelssohn Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55427; (612) 541-9109
|
ACE Hardware
|
$49.00
|
12 cu. ft.
|
1
|
3
|
|
3
|
Covered Bridge Composting Bin
Covered Bridge Organic Farms Coop
P.O. Box 164, Jefferson, OH 44047
(216) 576-5515
|
Direct from factory
|
$40.00 delivered
|
23 & 40 cu. ft. (adjust- able)
|
1
|
1
|
|
4
|
Green Magic Tumbler
Gardener's Supply Company
128 Intervale Rd., Burlington, VT 04501
(800) 876-5520; (802) 863-1700
|
Order from Gardener's Supply Co. Catalog
|
$119.95
|
6 cu. ft.
|
5
|
3
|
|
5
|
Presto Home & Garden Compost Bin
Presto Products Co.
1831 W. Winnebago, Appleton WI 54913
(920) 738-1440
|
Direct from Presto Outlet in Appleton
|
$7.50
|
18 cu. ft.
|
1
|
1
|
|
6
|
The Earth Machine
Norseman Plastics, 39 Westmore Dr., Rexdale, Ontario M9V 3Y6 Canada
(800) 267-4391
|
Direct from factory
|
$49.00
|
10.5 cu. ft.
|
1
|
2
|
|
7
|
#5201 Handy Composter
Wilmarc, Inc.
5266 E. 65th St., Indianapolis, IN 46220
(317) 849-9596
|
Direct from factory
|
$19.95 delivered
|
22 cu. ft. (adjust-able)
|
2
|
1
|
|
8
|
CP100 No-Turn Composter
Gardener Equipment Co., PO Box 106, Juneau, WI 53039; (414) 386-4880
|
Mills Fleet Farm
|
$80.00
|
14.8 cu. ft.
|
3
|
2
|
|
9
|
Soilsaver
Barclay Recycling, Inc., 75 Ingram Dr., Toronto, Ontario M6M 2M2 Canada
(800) 668-8430
|
True Value Hardware
|
$60.00
|
12.5 cu. ft.
|
5
|
2
|
|
10
|
Green Keeper Compost
Solarcone, Inc., P.O. Box 67
16438 Second St., Seward IL 61077-0067
(815) 247-8454
|
Direct from factory
|
$100.00
|
9 cu. ft.
|
4
|
2
|
|
11
|
Wooden Bin Composter
|
Homemade
|
$35.00
|
14.5 cu. ft.
|
1
|
1
|
|
12
|
Bio-Orb Composter
Shape Plastics Corp., PO Box 538, Sharon, WI 53585
(414) 736-8888
|
Menards
|
$99.00
|
23 cu. ft.
|
10
|
3
|
1. Costs were retail costs in 1994. Changes for 1995
were not noted.
2. Ease includes set-up.
3. Overall rating includes rate of decomposition, length
of high temperatures, favorable C/N ratio changes, & total N available.
| Date |
Bin Number & Temperature
Inside Bins |
Time |
Air Temp |
Comments |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
|
|
|
| 6/12 |
84 |
82 |
84 |
93 |
84 |
81 |
80 |
84 |
92 |
83 |
83 |
84 |
|
82 |
Orig. temps. within 1/2 hour
of filling. Bin 3 filled 1/2. Watered 3 qts. Filled 1/3 green, 2/3 brown. Started
June 4 (1/4). |
| 6/13 |
138 |
126 |
141
|
106 |
136 |
129 |
137 |
139 |
133 |
136 |
135 |
130 |
7:20 AM |
70 |
|
| 6/14 |
145 |
141 |
153
|
107 |
156 |
152 |
154 |
156 |
151 |
153 |
153 |
143 |
7:30 AM |
70 |
|
| 6/15 |
142 |
136 |
152
|
99 |
151 |
144 |
151 |
151 |
145 |
146 |
150 |
125 |
6:50 AM |
56 |
|
| 6/16 |
132 |
118 |
151
|
89 |
148 |
142 |
152 |
141 |
134 |
140 |
144 |
108 |
7:05 AM |
64 |
|
| 6/17 |
103 |
89 |
128
|
69 |
130 |
98 |
138 |
115 |
100 |
110 |
128 |
85 |
10:00 AM |
62 |
|
| 6/18 |
88 |
80 |
125
|
68 |
104 |
84 |
120 |
94 |
90 |
94 |
104 |
67 |
9:00 AM |
60 |
Rain for 2 days. High yest.
65. Rain 1.5" (3/4" overnight) |
| 6/19 |
72 |
74 |
115
|
64 |
100 |
80 |
100 |
86 |
83 |
84 |
92 |
66 |
8:00 AM |
59 |
High yest. 65 with rain.
Today misty, no sun. |
| 6/20 |
72 |
74 |
108
|
76 |
95 |
74 |
91 |
80 |
82 |
80 |
90 |
76 |
9:00 AM |
75 |
High yest. 72, low of 65.
|
| 6/21 |
80 |
78 |
115
|
84 |
97 |
85 |
100 |
86 |
87 |
88 |
97 |
90 |
7:30 AM |
72 |
|
| 6/22 |
82 |
77 |
112
|
92 |
101 |
84 |
97 |
88 |
86 |
88 |
104 |
88 |
8:30 AM |
69 |
|
| 6/23 |
78 |
77 |
104
|
70 |
100 |
84 |
99 |
91 |
89 |
88 |
106 |
88 |
7:26 AM |
60 |
|
| 6/24 |
76 |
71 |
96
|
68 |
98 |
80 |
92 |
86 |
81 |
78 |
98 |
78 |
7:04 AM |
61 |
|
| 6/25 |
73 |
71 |
89
|
72 |
90 |
78 |
90 |
85 |
78 |
76 |
86 |
73 |
7:40 AM |
65 |
|
| 6/26 |
77 |
73 |
85
|
79 |
85 |
80 |
89 |
91 |
81 |
78 |
89 |
78 |
10:20 AM |
75 |
|
| Ave Temp |
97.0 |
91.8 |
119.6
|
81.6 |
113.6 |
99.6 |
115.0 |
112.0 |
101.4 |
102.7 |
112.6 |
92.5 |
|
|
|